Last seminar of the course. Prison Alhaurín de la Torre Malaga the object of study. Issuer, Silvia, a fourth-the joint. On the collective motivation to try, high, very high. In fact, one of the electives I chose for this semester is "educational intervention in situations of deprivation of freedom ", sorry for the side for not meeting my expectations, but having been disappointed by the group precisely. In short, this is an issue on the sidelines. The seminar was interesting to know the role of both the educator and social worker at the center. Because we are educators in the middle! Buuut, this is a catch, of course! For the post of worker you must pass it a specific competitions, while for the position of educator has to approve a specific competitions, but the prison officer. First trick to singing. What about this? Educators we are lying, as We are accustomed by now. They are not people qualified in this area I mean, even if contractual mentioned display the role of educator. This confirms again the reality of wanting to be professionals in a profession recognized and undervalued and considering that anyone with a basic knowledge in the broader social field can perform the duties of an educator. Man, if this is because we have a social profession, we are all part of society and we all know as chatter, take care not to understand this figure, but we are falling into a grave error. Controversial part.
The teacher has a more direct contact with the inmate, conducts an orientation and they depend on its classification of prisoners when they enter prison. Meanwhile, social workers, more so, perform management procedures, provide information and establish contact with families. I think the latter is an important aspect for a good speech and everything to get the reinsercción of prisoners. How can reintegrate a person who has been isolated from the world over time and when X comes back to settle in the same family and social context that lived? Is complicated and in most cases is not achieved because the speaker commented that 70% of prisoners returning to crime when they left prison. Working with the family has to be one of the major objectives has been to prepare the family for the family of prisoner reintegration has been working with them while working with the inmate.
But before this I find a problem, the ratio covering these professionals care for inmates is higher than that provided by law, and is perhaps why we can not focus to cover other aspects such as family inmates of the prison. Also have a lack of space for the development of activities and, sometimes, lack of internal motivation, to which we must add the factor of the high illiteracy rate.
Illiteracy, lack of activities low motivation of inmate treatment and a shortage of families are problematic product of a bad speech with the collective center.
As Erich Fromm said, an author who has served me based on this subject, impotence and security that the individual suffers isolation from modern society after release of all bonds that once gave meaning and security in life. The individual can not bear this isolation. How to be isolated, has been extremely helpless in comparison with the outside world, on the other hand inspires deep fear. Because of its isolation, the world's unity has been broken for him, and thus no longer have any point signature orientation. So overwhelmed by the self-doubt, the meaning of life, and every principle governing the actions. Both the helplessness and doubt paralyze his life, and thus the man, to live, try to avoid the freedom he has achieved, negative liberty, looking drawn up new links. Escape from freedom not lost freedom restored, but only helps you forget that is a separate identity.
For all this, it is essential to integrate families in the intervention process. It really is a transcendental agent when working with all groups, but especially if we consider that it may be the only connecting link with the outside, which will come once left the center to restore these links should not miss while you are inside, but worked. I do not understand is that if they know that why do not promote more of that factor, rather than perform tasks such as efforts to provide information or arrange necessary otherwise. So maybe we reduce the rate of 70% of repeat ex-prisoners.
What is clear is that this problem comes from older links and general incompetence to take part in the matter, a system that seems not to believe in the rehabilitation of an inmate is not exactly the most appropriate to achieve this goal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment